Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7902 (UTT)

HARKESH SINGH v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

WPMB/421/2026 · 2026-07-08

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010085752026 2026:UHC:5538-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 08th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 421 OF 2026 Harkesh Singh ….Petitioner Versus District Magistrate and others. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Tijil Gangwar, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents : Sri M.S. Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Sri Virendra Kumar Kaparuwan, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. ORDER : 1. Sri Tijil Gangwar, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, states that he is not pressing the writ petition as the cause of action does not survive. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed accordingly. _____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. ___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dt: 08th July, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3a eb1097d17dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6 179B8E010331BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.07.10 10:45:01 +05'30'