1 ( 2026:HHC:16796 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 559 of 2026 Decided on: 14.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Amisha ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 3. Mr. Pawnish Kumar Shukla, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) The perusal of reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 goes to show that no demolition or dispossession action has been taken by the replying respondent in violation of the directions passed by this Court. 2. Therefore, in view of the reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 2, learned counsel for the petitioner stated 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:16796 that he does not want to pursue the present contempt petition. 3. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed, as not pressed. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 14th May, 2026 Judge (raman)