SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010087932026 CRLR/386/2026 Kuasha Sharma --Revisionist Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. R.C. Tamta, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. 3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the revisionist seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal revision. He has submitted that the revisionist, who is the victim have a right to appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. against acquittal. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present criminal revisionist is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the revisionist to seek appropriate remedy, as per law. (Alok Mahra J.) 09.07.2026 Ujjwal