Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 790 (RAJ)

SMT VINITA SHARMA AND OTHERS v. SATYA NARAIN SHARMA

CFA/185/2013 · 2026-03-17

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11306] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 185/2013 1. Smt Vinita Sharma, W/o Late Shri Devendra Kumar Sharma, 2. Gaurav Sharma, S/o Late Shri Devendra Kumar Sharma, 3. Rahul Sharma, S/o Late Shri Devendra Kumar Sharma (at the time of filing of the suit minor but during trial has become major) All R/o Sector No.2, House No.448, Vidhadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Appellants Versus Satya Narain Sharma, S/o Shri Kailash Chand Sharma, R/o SB-3, Mahaveer Udhyan Marg, Shiksha Sankul Ke Pass, JLN Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 17/03/2026 1. Matter has come up on application (IA No.1/2025) seeking withdrawal of appeal as well as for refund of Court fees. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the present appeal the parties to the appeal have finally settled the pending dispute in the pious spirit of Lok Adalat, and in furtherance thereof, a registered sale deed dated 21.04.2015 has already been executed in favour of the respondent. [2026:RJ-JP:11306] (2 of 2) [CFA-185/2013] 3. In view of the above, and upon instructions from his client, learned counsel for the appellant does not wish to pursue the present first appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the same. He further prays that the court fees so paid by the appellant may kindly be refunded back to the appellant. 4. Heard. 5. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the appellant is entitled for the refund of the Court fees of Rs.84,155/- in terms of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors.1, therefore, the Registry is directed to prepare a certificate regarding the refund of the Court fees of Rs.84,155/- in favour of the appellant. 7. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the present first appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 8. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-135 1 (2021) 3 SCC 560