Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7899 (UTT)

NARENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1971/2026 · 2026-07-08

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010111502026 2026:UHC:5560 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1971/2026 Narendra Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Pradeep Chamyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Pande, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. According to petitioner, certain development projects were proposed by the Development Committee, Dhauladevi and were approved by District Panchayat Raj Officer (DPRO) vide order dated 04.07.2024; however, upon re-constitution of the Development Committee, a resolution has been passed by the Development Committee to modify the approval earlier granted. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to implement the approved plans which were sanctioned for the year 2024-25 for development of Vikas Khand Dholadevi, Almora. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities not to cancel the approved plans which UKHC010111502026 2026:UHC:5560 were sanctioned for the year 2024-25 for development of Vikas Khand Dholadevi, Almora. (c) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate action on the representation of petitioner dated 12/06/2026 (Annexure No. 4) Page No (22 to 23).” 4. State Counsel was asked to get instructions. On instructions, he submits that District Panchayat Raj Officer is not an authority competent to grant approval or to cancel the proposal submitted by Development Committee. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation before the Chief Development Officer, Almora. If he makes representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within three weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 08.07.2026 Mahinder/