Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7899 (GAU)

NINDESWARI RABHA v. KANIKA RABHA KALITA

I.A.(Civil)/1622/2026 · 2026-06-09

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010096702026 2026:GAU-AS:8244 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1622/2026 NINDESWARI RABHA W/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KRISHNAI, GURIA PART- II, BHOGDABI, P.O.- KRISHNAI IN THE DISTRICT OF GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS KANIKA RABHA KALITA W/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA, RESIDENT OF RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI, P.O. P.S.- DUDHNOI, DISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM. 2:MUKUT RABHA S/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI P.O. P.S.- DUDHNOI DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM. 3:BIBIDUL RABHA S/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI P.O. P.S.- DUDHNOI DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS, MR D BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/4 Linked Case : Test.App./7/2026 NINDESWARI RABHA W/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA R/O VILLAGE- KRISHNAI GURIA PART- II BHOGDABI P.O.- KRISHNAI IN THE DISTRICT OF GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS KANIKA RABHA KALITA AND 2 ORS. W/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI P.O. AND P.S.- DUDHNOI DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM 2:MUKUT RABHA S/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI P.O. AND P.S.- DUDHNOI DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM 3:BIBIDUL RABHA S/O LATE DHARMESWAR RABHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- THEKASU PT.-I AMRABATI P.O. AND P.S.- DUDHNOI DISTRICT- GOALPARA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR H DAS Advocate for : MR G J SAIKIA(R1 2 3) appearing for KANIKA RABHA KALITA AND 2 ORS. Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 10/06/2026 The instant application has been filed praying for correction of a typographical error of the date of order which has been typed as 02.05.2026 instead of 05.02.2026. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. D. Baruah. 3. Learned counsel submits that by an order dated 29.04.2026 in I.A(Civil)/1308/2026, this Court had stayed the impugned Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2026 in MISC Revocation Case No.01/2020 passed by the learned District Judge, Goalpara. It is submitted that in paragraph-2&3 of the said order dated 29.04.2026, the date of the Judgment and Order has been rightly shown as 05.02.2026. However, at paragraph-5 of the said order dated 29.04.2026 there is a typographical error in asmuchas the date of the impugned Judgment and Order has been shown as 02.05.2026 instead of 05.02.2026. The learned counsel accordingly prays that the said order may be modified and corrected as 05.02.2026. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. G.J. Saikia, is present and has no objection. 5. Accordingly, the instant application is allowed. The date of the impugned Judgment and Order at paragraph-5 of the order dated 29.04.2026 is corrected as 05.02.2026 instead of 02.05.2026. Page No.# 4/4 6. Application stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant