ASAD @ ARSHAD S/O RAFIQ KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6916/2026 · 2026-05-22
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7894 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7894 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6916/2026
1. Asad @ Arshad S/o Rafiq Khan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 216-B, S.m.s.a. Colony Behind Power House, Muhana, Jaipur South. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).
2. Asif Khan S/o Shri Rafiq Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 216-B, S.m.s.a. Colony Behind Power House, Muhana, Jaipur South. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP, Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan, Mr. Ajay Kumar Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 22/05/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner No.1 does not want to press the present criminal misc. bail application and seeks liberty to file afresh after recording the statements of the injured.
2. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. bail application qua the petitioner No.1 is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
3. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner No.2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.333/2026 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the
[2026:RJ-JP:21768] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6916/2026] offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 307, 110 and 3(5) of BNS.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner No.2 submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the specific allegation of causing injury at the head of the injured as attributed towards the accused-petitioner No.1. There is no allegation that petitioner No.2 caused injury at the head of the injured, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with the other co-accused assaulted the victim and the victim has received fracture on the parietal bone and also sustained a grievous injury on his finger, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
6. Heard and perused the material available on record.
7. Considering the fact that the specific allegation of causing head injury to the injured is attributed towards the petitioner No.1. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner No.2 on bail.
8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner No.2 Asif
[2026:RJ-JP:21768] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6916/2026] Khan S/o Shri Rafiq Khan, in connection with FIR No.333/2026 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/79