- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10638 RSA No. 270 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 270 OF 2011 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE NANJAPPA. 2. SMT. RAMAKKA W/O RANGAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LR’S 2(A) SRI SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 2(B) KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2(C) MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2(D) RAMESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 2(E) VEERABHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2(F) SMT. BHAGYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 2(A) TO 2(F) ARE CHILDREN OF RAMAKKA W/O RANGAPPA ALL ARE R/AT KALKUNTE AGRAHARA ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI Digitally signed by MALATHI CHALUVA IYENGAR Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10638 RSA No. 270 of 2011 HOSAKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560117. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.VISHWANATH P BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR A2(A-F) IS ABSENT) AND: 1. K N KARIYAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS 1(A) SRI RANGANATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 1(B) SMT PADMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 1(C) SRI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 1(D) SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 1(E) SMT MANJULA AGED ABOUT 37 YEAR 1(F) SMT LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 1(G) SMT VARALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 1(H) SRI SRIRAM AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1(a) TO 1(h) ARE CHILDREN OF LATE K N KARIYAPPA ALL ARE R/AT KALKUNTE AGRAHARA ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-560105. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10638 RSA No. 270 of 2011 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SAMARTH SREEDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A) R1(C,D,F & H) SERVICE HELD SUFFICENT V/O DATED:23.03.2016 AGAINST R1(B E & G) APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED V/O DATED: 23.03.2016) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 05.09.2009 PASSED IN OS.NO.47/2003 BY THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 30.09.2010 PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK COURT-1 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BANGALORE IN RA NO: 190/2009 IN SO FAR AS ITEMS 5 AND 7 OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT 1. None appears for the appellant. 2. This Court by order dated 02.12.2025 has passed the following order: “Learned counsel for the appellant in RSA.No.147/2011 is present, who is also appearing for the respondent in RSA.No.270/2011. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant in RSA.No.270/2011 in the morning, as well as afternoon session. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10638 RSA No. 270 of 2011 Therefore, the matter is adjourned on a cost of Rs.1,000/- payable by the appellant in RSA.No.270/2011 to the respondent. Since Sri Samarth Shreedhar, learned counsel is appearing for respondent No.1(a), office is directed not to show the name of Sri N.S.Bhat in the cause list. List this matter after two weeks.” 3. Even today, the cost of Rs.1,000/- imposed on the appellant has not been paid and none appears for the appellant. 4. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3