Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7890 (GAU)

SATYA BORGOHAIN v. PHANINDRA JIDUNG, AES AND ANR.

Cont.Cas(C)/381/2020 · 2026-06-10

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010117682020 2026:GAU-AS:8300 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/381/2020 SATYA BORGOHAIN S/O LT. KHAGI BORGOHAIN, R/O VILL. SILI ASOMIA GOAN, P.O. BHAGAWAN, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-787057 VERSUS PHANINDRA JIDUNG, AES AND ANR. THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19, ASSAM, DIST. KAMRUP, PIN-781019 2:SMTI. MAMATA HOJAI AES THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 ASSAM DISTRICT-KAMRUP PIN NO.781019 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS A BUJARBARUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : MS. R MAZUMDAR, SC, SEC. EDU. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Page No.# 2/2 11-06-2026 This court under its order dated 23.09.2019 passed in WP(C) 6543/2015 directed the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for provincialisation of his service as an Assistant Teacher (Arts) in Sili Surjyodai High School in terms of the Act, 2017. The respondent has in the meantime carried out an exercise and found that the name of the petitioner was not even sent by District Level Scrutiny Committee, which is required under Section 12 of the Act, 2017. Accordingly, citing such reason, the speaking order dated 29.03.2023 was passed. In view of the aforesaid, the order dated 23.09.2019 passed in WP(C) 6543/2015 stands complied with. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach appropriate forum in the event he is aggrieved by non-sending of his name by the District Level Scrutiny Committee. JUDGE Comparing Assistant