APHC010122382019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 445/2019 Between: 1. J.SRINIVASA RAO, CHEBROLE VILLAGE, UNGUTUR MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SATYANARAYANA NAKKANTI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘the Cr.P.C.’), by the Petitioners/Accused challenging the judgment dated 23.01.2019 in Crl.A.No.210 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the learned IV Additional 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.445 of 2019 Dated 14.08.2026 Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Tanuku, whereby the order dated 31.05.2017 passed in C.C.No.136 of 2015 on the file of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tanuku, was confirmed. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tanuku Sub-Jail, and the Inspector of Police, Tanuku Police Station, are present. They have submitted the requisite information. Their presence is dispensed with. 3. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. The Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Tanuku, has submitted that the Petitioner was lodged in the Sub-Jail, Tanuku, as a convict prisoner from 22.01.2019 to 13.04.2019. Thereafter, the Petitioner was transferred to the Central Prison, Rajahmundry, where he remained in detention until 27.04.2019. Thus, the Petitioner had undergone detention for a period of three months and six days. There are no similar adverse antecedents culminating in a finding of guilt against the Petitioner. Further, the previous convictions, if any, were not brought to the notice of the learned Trial Court at the time of passing the judgment. 5. There are no merits in the revision case. The conviction is sustained; however, in regard to sentence of imprisonment, as the Petitioner has already undergone the sentence of three months six days and there are no similar adverse antecedents against the Petitioner, he is sentenced to undergo the imprisonment which he had already undergone. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.445 of 2019 Dated 14.08.2026 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date:14.08.2026 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.445 of 2019 Dated 14.08.2026 145 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 445/2019 Date: 14.08.2026 KMS