[2026:RJ-JP:21764] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2ND Bail Application No. 6554/2026 Amit Urf Lakha S/o Shri Ranveer Singh, R/o Sehad, Police Station Pachari Kalan, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Aditya Sharma & Mr. Tanmay Mathur for Mr. Sandeep Singh Nirwan HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 22/05/2026 1. This 2nd bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 210/2024 registered at Police Station Pacheri Kala, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 329(3), 324(5), 109(1), 351(3), 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present bail application is against the order dated 16.04.2026 passed by the trial Court whereby bail application No.782/2025 has been dismissed due to non-compliance of the condition to regularly mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed by this Court vide order date 10.3.2025 in S.B. Criminal [2026:RJ-JP:21764] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6554/2026] Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 782/2025. It is submitted that the accused-petitioner has consistently co-operated with the trial in the said case and submits that due to some personal or family reasons he could not appear before the concerned police station due to which his bail application was revoked. Learned counsel also undertakes that the accused-petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the Court, therefore, in the interest of justice, this 2nd bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that henceforth the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court; that the accused-petitioner has consistently cooperated with the trial in the said case and he is in custody since 16.04.2026. Hence, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Amit Urf Lakha S/o Shri Ranveer Singh is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, out of whom one surety should be a close relative of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the Trial [2026:RJ-JP:21764] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6554/2026] Court. He shall appear before the concerned Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. 7. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. 8. It is made clear that in case of further misuse of liberty of bail, subsequent prayer of bail on behalf of the petitioner shall not be considered. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/27