Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7880 (BOM)

CHINTAMANI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL THR ITS HEAD MASTER SUCHETA K DAITHANKAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/11673/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 55-WP-11673-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11673 OF 2026 CHINTAMANI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL THROUGH ITS HEAD MASTER VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Mr. Arvind S.Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 08th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. It is a matter of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioners Institutions under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 2. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner, learned AGP for State and learned advocate for respondent No.1. 3. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent authorities to undertake scrutiny of the petitioner’s proposal independently, on it’s own merit and decide the same as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today and if petitioner is found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to it within a period of four weeks thereafter. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2026:BHC-AUG:41504-DB