Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 78760 (MAD)

G.Ravi v. Gagandeep Singh Bedi I.A.S., and 3 others

CONT P/4192/2025 · 2026-02-20

V Lakshminarayanan

Special Leave Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 1. G.Ravi Deputy Block Development Officer (Noon Meal Scheme) KulithalaiPanchayat Union Karur District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Gagandeep Singh Bedi I.A.S., and 3 others The Principal Secretary To Government, Government Of Tamilnadu, Rural Development And Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009. 2.P.Ponniah I.A.S., The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600015. 3.M.Thangavel I.A.S., The District Collector Karur District, Karur. 4.Anim Cherian The Principal Accountant General (A And E) Tamilnadu No.361 Anna Salai, Chennai 600018. Contemnor(s) 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 PRAYER Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for committing Contempt of Court by willfully disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.26306 of 2023 dated 18.02.2025. For Petitioner (s): For Contemnor(s): Ms.S.Deepika Mr.R.Ramanlal,,ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL ASST BY Mr.L.S.M.Hazan Fizal Addl Govt Pleader FOR THE RESPONDENT ORDER On the last occasion, Mr.R.Ramanlal, Additional Advocate General appearing for Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Additional Government Pleader reported that a Special Leave Petition has been preferred against the order passed by the Division Bench confirming the order of which the contempt is alleged. I granted time to enable the respondents to process the Special Leave Petition. 2.When the matter was called today, the learned Additional Advocate General has produced an order passed by the Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Civil).Diary No(s).1369 of 2026, dated 09.02.2026. The Supreme Court in paragraph No.6 has directed that, if any contempt is pending alleging non- implementation of the impugned judgment, the same shall not be proceeded further. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 3.As the matter is now seized by the Supreme Court, this Contempt Petition stands closed. In case, the Special Leave Petition is decided in favour of the contempt petitioner, it is open to him to file an application to revive the contempt petition. 20-02-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.Gagandeep Singh Bedi I.A.S., and 3 others The Principal Secretary To Government, Government Of Tamilnadu, Rural Development And Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009. 2.P.Ponniah I.A.S., The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600015. 3.M.Thangavel I.A.S., The District Collector Karur District, Karur. 4.Anim Cherian The Principal Accountant General (A And E) Tamilnadu No.361 Anna Salai, Chennai 600018. 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. krk CONT P No. 4192 of 2025 20-02-2026 4 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis