Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11.
11. (DL) (DL) 25.03.2026 25.03.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 6275 OF 2026 LOHARAM HALDAR VS.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Suman Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Moniruzzaman, Adv. …for the State Mr. Zubair Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Rasidul Islam, Adv. …for the Respondent No.12
1. At the time of call learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
2. State respondents and respondent no.12 are represented by learned advocates.
3. In view of such submission writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with better particulars on self-same cause of action.
4. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.
(SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)