Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 78757 (MAD)

The Managing Director v. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

CMP/29504/2025 · 2026-02-03

R Suresh Kumar, Shamim Ahmed

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 29504 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CMP No. 29504 of 2025 in WA. Sr.No.184714 of 2025 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Salem) Limited, Salem – 7. ..Appellant Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 09. & 7 Ors. ..Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 223 days in filing the above writ appeal challenging the passed in WP.No.15360 of 2017 dated 11.09.2024. For Appellant : Mrs.Madhura Donti Reddy For Respondent(s): Mr. E.Veda Bagath Singh, Special Government Pleader [R1] Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, Standing Counsel [R2] Mr.K.M.Ramesh, Senior counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29504 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 for Mr.V.Subramani [R3] RR4, 6 to 8 [given up] R5 – notice send [no appearance] Order (Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 223 days in filing the above writ appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the 1st respondent, Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent and Mr.K.M.Ramesh, learned Senior counsel for Mr.V.Subramani, learned counsel takes notice for the 3rd respondent. They do not have any objection in condoning the delay petition. In respect of other respondents, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they are not the main contesting respondent. Therefore, the petitioner seeks permission to give up those respondents from the array of respondents both in the petition and in the proposed writ appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29504 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 Recording the same, this petition is ordered. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K.,J.) (S.S.A.,J.) 03-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 29504 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 R.SURESH KUMAR J. AND SHAMIM AHMED J. MP CMP No. 29504 of 2025 in WA SR NO. 184714 of 2025 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis