- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13667 RSA No. 1848 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1848 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHELUVAIAH S/O LATE SINGRAIAH AGED 74 YEARS 2. SMT BORAMMA W/O CHELUVAIAH AGED 62 YEARS 3. SRI VENKATESH S/O CHELUVAIAH, AGED 51 YEARS 4. SRI NAGARAJU S/O CHELUVAIAH AGED 49 YEARS 5. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O SRI NAGARAJU AGED 44 YEARS 6. SRI CHELUVA S/O CHELUVAIAH AGED 43 YEARS 7. SMT CHIKKATHAYAMMA D/O CHELUVAIAH Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13667 RSA No. 1848 of 2022 AGED 38 YEARS APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 7 RESIDING AT RAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE HANCHYA MAIN ROAD KASABA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT 570019 8. SRI VENKATESH S/O LATE VENKATAIAH AGED 59 YEARS 9. SMT MANGALAMMA W/O SRI VENKATESH AGED 54 YEARS 10. SRI RAJU S/O SRI VENKATESH AGED 39 YEARS 11. SMT SHILPA W/O SRI RAJU AGED 35 YEARS 12. SMT LAKSHMI W/O D/O VENKATESH AGED 33 YEARS 13. SMT SARASWATHI D/O VENKATESH AGED 32 YEARS 14. SRI SATHISH S/O SRI VENKATESH AGED 29 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13667 RSA No. 1848 of 2022 APPELLANTS NO.8 TO 14 ARE RESIDING AT DOOR NO 375, 4TH BLOCK RAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE HANCHYA MAIN ROAD KASABA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT 570019. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI JAVARAIAH @ JAVARAPPA S/O LATE CHENNAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT DOOR NO 137 RAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT 570019 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.299/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFIED THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.810/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13667 RSA No. 1848 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT Matter is listed for non-compliance of office objection for IV time. Even though further time is granted on cost, neither cost is paid, nor compliance is done. 2. Learned counsel for appellants submits that he has no instructions and has issued notice of retirement. Since same is not filed, this would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4