Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7873 (GAU)

MANAHARI BAISHYA v. PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/527/2017 · 2026-06-09

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203322017 2026:GAU-AS:8267 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/527/2017 MANAHARI BAISHYA S/O-LATE KUMUD BAISHYA, R/O- AND VILL- SARIAHTABI, P.O- MILANPUR, DIST- NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS. COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ELEMENTARY, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06 2:BIREN CH. PHUKAN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC BODOFA NWGWR KOKRAJHAR 3:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION GOVT OF ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19 4:RABI SANKAR BORGOYARI DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION BTC KOKRAJHA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A NATH, MR.A R TAHBILDAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, MS. P CHAKRABORTY,MR. M R LASKAR,MR.A DEKA(R-3),MR. S P BHATTACHARJEE Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 10-06-2026 1. None appears for the petitioner on call. 2. None did represent the petitioner on 30.04.2025 & on 31.05.2024. 3. Alleging willful and deliberate violation of this Court’s common judgment and order dated 17.07.2014, passed in WP(C) No. 3200/2007 and other connected writ petitions, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant contempt petition. 4. The concerned authorities have passed an order on 04.08.2017 in compliance of the order dated 17.07.2014, however, it is contended in the present petition that inspite of passing of such order, the benefits have given only to those petitioners who have filed contempt petition earlier. 5. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioner, the present contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant