Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 78717 (MAD)

G.K.VENKATARAMAN v. R.RAJENDRAN

CRP/5898/2025 · 2026-01-05

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No. 5898 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CRP No. 5898 of 2025 and CMP No.29128 of 2025 1. G.K.Venkataraman S/o. Late Govindasamy, No.73/70, Avoor Muthaiah Street, New Washermenpet, Chennai 600 081. 2. Annapurani D/o. Late.Govindasamy W/o. Ravisankar, No.25/127, Mettu Street, Ambedkar Nagar, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai 600 019. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. R.Rajendran S/o. Late.P.Ramachandran, New No.38, Old No.136, Pidariyar Koil Street, Chennai 600 001. 2.G.Muthukumar S/o. Late.Govindasamy, No.73/70, Avoor Muthaiah Street, New Washermenpet, Chennai 600 081. Respondent(s) 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 5898 of 2025 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order for returning the application, dt. 25.10.2025 filed by the petitioners in E.A Sr No. 74331 of 2025 in E.P. No. 418 of 2025 on the file of the Honble X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.David For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Rajkumar Pandian for R1 No appearance-R2 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present revision petition has been filed, challenging the return of application in E.A.Sr.No.74331 of 2025 filed under Order 21 Rule 26 and 29 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. 3. It is fairly brought to my notice by the respondent/decree holder that subsequently on 15.12.2025, the execution petition has been dismissed, giving liberty to the decree holder to file a fresh execution petition subsequent to the disposal of O.S.No.6381 of 2025 on the file of XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. 4. The learned counsel for the decree holder would therefore state that nothing survives for consideration in the present revision, which is only challenging the return of application under Order 21 Rule 26 and 29 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, pending the revision petition. 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 5898 of 2025 5. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner also acknowledges the said fact that the Execution petition has been dismissed on 15.12.2025. 6. In the light of the above, nothing survives for consideration in the revision. However, the dismissal of the Execution Petition shall not come in the way of the respondent/decree holder, seeking to execute the judgment and decree passed subject to being successful in O.S.No.6381 of 2025 pending on the file of XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. At the same time, having obtained the decree, the respondent cannot be made to wait endlessly and hence, in the interest of justice, this Court directs the XVII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, to dispose of O.S.No.6381 of 2025 expeditiously at any rate, within a period of six (6) months from the date of completion of service of summons. 7. With the above observation and direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 05-01-2026 Jd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 5898 of 2025 P.B.BALAJI J. jd To X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. CRP No. 5898 of 2025 05-01-2026 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis