Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7867 (JHR)

NANDLAL PANDIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1029/2026 · 2026-05-01

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12997 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1029 of 2026 --------- Nandlal Pandit aged about 69 yrs., S/o Late Budhan Pandit, R/o Village Chakradaha, P.O. & P.S. Bengabad, Dist. Giridih. ....Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agarwal, A.P.P. --------- 04/Dated:-01.05.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for extension of time to deposit the fine amount of Rs.20,000/- to the D.L.S.A, Giridih as per the order dated 05.12.2022 passed by this Court in Cr. Rev. No. 850 of 2010, in view of the fact that there was a timeline for payment of fine amount in the order dated 05.12.2022. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner could not deposit Rs.20,000/- fine amount before the D.L.S.A., Giridih, he has been taken back into custody; as such, the petitioner prays that the order dated 05.12.2022 be modified to the extent that the period of four months, which has been indicated in the said order dated 05.12.2022, be modified and extended by a further period of six weeks from today. 4. Learned A.P.P. does not have any serious objection. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, para-9 of the order dated 05.12.2022 passed in Cr. 2026:JHHC:12997 2 Rev. No.850 of 2010, is hereby, modified to the extent that the petitioner shall pay the aforesaid fine amount of Rs.20,000/- within a further period of six weeks from today before the D.L.S.A., Giridih, failing which, he shall serve rest of the sentence as ordered by the learned appellate court. 6. It has been informed that the petitioner has already been taken back into custody; accordingly, the moment he will pay the fine amount, if within the stipulated period, he shall be released and shall be discharged from liability of his bail bonds, if any. 7. With the aforesaid modification, the instant Cr.M.P. stands allowed. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned court through “FAX”. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MAY 01, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 04/05/2026