1 2026:JHHC:12952 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- Cr.M .P. No.1076 of 2026 ---- 1. Md. Rajjak Ansari, aged about 57 years, son of Abash Ansari. 2. Md. Khatib Ansari @khatib Ansari, aged about 52 years, son of Late Niyamat Ansari. 3. Saddam Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Late Rikali Ansari Ansari. 4.Md. Imran Ansari @ Imran Ansari, aged about 28 years, son of Khatib Ansari. 5. Md. Kadir Ansari @ Kadir Ansari, aged about 69 years, son of Ahsan Ansari. 6. Sagir Ansari, aged about 42 years, son of Jabbar Ansari. 7. Mantu Ansari, aged about 52 years, son of Late Jabbar Ansari. 8. Titwa Ansari @ Saddam Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Anwar Ansari. 9. Imran Ansari, aged about 44 years, son of Late Paigam Ansari. 10. Ejaj Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Kadir Ansari. 11. Md. Ashlam Ansari @ Ashlam Ansari, aged about 31 years, son of Md. Rajjak Ansari. 12. Mikail Ansari, aged about 72 years, son of Ajit Ansari, 13. Usuf Ansari, aged about 47 years, son of Mikail Ansari. 14. Tanbir Ansari, aged about 32 years, son of Mikail Ansari. 15. Rokail Ansari @ Rikail Ansari, aged about 70 years, son of Late Ajit Ansari. 16. Firdosh Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Anwar Ansari. 17. Md. Asfaque Ansari @ Asfaque Ansari, aged about 34 years, son of Late Hafiz Ansari. 18. Rajeev Ansari @ Salauddin Ansari, @ Salauddin Ansari aged about 42 years, son of Rokail Ansari. 19. Alim Ansari, aged about 67 years, son of Late Viju Mian. 20. Dabloo Ansari @ Rahim Ansari, aged about 50 years, son of Late Ajij Ansari. 21. Samsad Ansari, aged about 44 years, son of Alim Ansari. All are residents of Village Nawadih Kakni, P.O. and P.S. - Saraiyahat, District- Dumka, Jharkhand.... Petitioner (s) -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party-2 :- Mr. Ankit Burman, Advocate ---- 4/01.05.2026 This petition has been filed for restoration of Criminal 2 Revision No.8078 of 2025(F), which stood dismissed for non- compliance of peremptory order dated 24.02.2026. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that now the petitioners have already surrendered before the learned court and Certificate to that effect has been annexed in the supplementary affidavit. He next submits that since the Certificate was not filed and in view of the nature of the order, the Criminal revision petition was dismissed. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent State as well as O.P No.2 have got no serious objection if the said Criminal Revision petition is restored to its original file. 4. Considering that now the surrender Certificate has been filed which has been brought on record by way of supplementary affidavit, and in that view of the matter, said Criminal Revision is restored to its original file. 5. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of, accordingly. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/, 01.05.2026