Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7863 (UTT)

ANAGPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPPIL/84/2026 · 2026-07-09

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010112352026 2026:UHC:5588-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (PIL) No.84 of 2026 9th July, 2026 Anagpal and Another -----Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Shabnam, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Puran Singh Bisht, learned C.S.C. along with Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for respondent nos.5 and 6. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER: 1. Although allegations have been made in the writ petition against respondent nos.5 to 8 but from the perusal of the memo of parties, we find that there are no such respondent nos.7 and 8. Moreover, the date and event chart is also defective, wherein although various events have been mentioned but dates, on which these events have taken place, are not mentioned. 2. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition, if so advised. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 09.07.2026 SS 1