SUBHASH KUMAR RANA @ SUBHASH KUMAR ALLIAS SUBASH DANGI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/830/2025 · 2026-05-01
Rajesh Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7859 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7859 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:12899 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.830 of 2025
....
1. Subhash Kumar Rana @ Subhash Kumar @ subash Dangi, aged about 29 Years, Son of Sakaldeo Rana/Dangi
2. Rahul Kumar Mishra, aged about 31 years Son of Late-Dhurub Kishore Mishra
3. Raghunath Khemlal Dangi @ Raghu Dangi aged about 62 years Son of Khemlal Dangi
4. Gauri Shankar Pandey aged about 48 years Son of Chakoudi Pandey
5. Niraj Kumar Singh aged about 34 years Son of Ram Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Singh
6. Nageshwar Mahto/Dangi aged about 39 years Son of Late-Mahadev Mahto
7. Pramod Ram/Dangi aged about 42 years Son of Shiv Dayal Mahto All are Resident of Vill-Bara Patharia, P.O.-Karui, P.S.-Itkhori, District-Chatra
.… Appellants
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Prem Bhuiyan aged about 26 years Son of Devi Bhuiyan, Resident of Vill- Pathriya, P.O. and P.S.-Itkhori, District-Chatra
.... Respondents
.... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellants
: Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi, Adv. For the State
: Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. For the Resp. No.2
: Mr. B.K.Dubey, Adv. ....
07/01.05.2026
1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Chatra in A.B.P. No.754 of 2025 in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No.104 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 329(3), 352, 351(2)(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3(1)(s)(g) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby and whereunder the prayer of the appellants for grant of anticipatory bail have been rejected.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants that since final form has been submitted in favour of the appellants, hence, at present no cause of action survives to maintain the present appeal and he has instruction from the clients not to pursue this case.
4. In view of above submission, the present criminal appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 01.05.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 04.05.2026