Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7857 (KAR)

MR KOSHY P KOSHY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8555/2021 · 2026-03-17

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15748 WP No. 8555 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 8555 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. KOSHY P. KOSHY SON OF TONY P KOSHY AGED 39 YEARS RESIDING AT KOSHISH, KORREYA ROAD, KOCHI - 682 012 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU - 560 001 3. BANASWADI POLICE STATION BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE/ STATION HOUSE OFFICER BANASWADI, BENGALURU. 4. MR. ASHWIN KT MATHEW AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O MATHEW THOMAS, R/AT NO.416, 3RD FLOOR, HRBR BLOCK 2, KALYAN NAGAR, BENGALURU-43 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3; SRI. W.M.SUNDARAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15748 WP No. 8555 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS, RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM CAUSING ANY THREAT OR ABUSES ON THE PETITIONER IN THE GUISE OF ENQUIRING INTO/INVESTIGATING THE CLAIM/COMPLAINT OF MR. ASHVIN PERTAINING TO THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND MR. ASHVIN ARISING OUT OF THE PARTNERSHIP FIRM BY THE NAME OF LIFE BY DESIGN, FORMED VIDE THE PARTNERSHIP DEED DATED 27.10.2014 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to withdraw the petition as the same has become infructuous. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48