HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33323 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Dhirenda Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel holding brief appeared for the accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Rijwan to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 94 of 2026, under Sections 310(2), 311, 317(3), 61(2) BNS, P.S.- Crossing Republic, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated during investigation in FIR dated 06.05.2026 lodged by the informant with the allegation that while they were engaged in reloading of the money in ATM, the Van in which the currency notes are kept has been robbed by the anonymous persons. During investigation, the name of co-accused Kaif has been figured out and in the disclosure statement of the co-accused. Six persons were named including the accused/applicant, who is pursuing law. It is further contended that the accused/applicant has no criminal history, he has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.05.2026. The charge sheet is submitted. There is no other material available against the accused/applicant than the confessional statement. He seeks to be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravita Singh, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rijwan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering that the name of accused/applicant figured out from the statement of co-accused having no other material recovered, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 18, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 33323 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad