[2026:RJ-JP:22636] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.242/2026 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.3784/2021 Trivikram Singh Rathore S/o Shri Dushyant Singh Rathore, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Nayala House Moti Doongri Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner/Applicant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Pallavi Singh W/o Trivikram Singh, Aged About 40 Years, At Present Resident Of Nayala House, Moti Doongri Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar for Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. GA Mr. Samar Pratap Singh for Mr. Rajat Ranjan JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/05/2026 1. The instant misc. application has been submitted by the applicant/petitioner seeking recall of the order dated 02.05.2026 passed by this Court while deciding SB Criminal Misc. Petition No.3784/2021. 2. Counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that on the fateful day, i.e. on 02.05.2026, the counsel for the parties could not appear before this Court due to circumstances beyond their control. Hence, under such circumstances, the aforesaid petition was disposed of by this Court granting liberty to the petitioner to [2026:RJ-JP:22636] (2 of 3) [CRLMA-242/2026] submit representation before the Investigating Officer and the Investigating Officer was directed to consider the same and submit conclusion report of investigation before the concerned Court under Section 173 Cr.P.C. 3. Counsel submits that the parties have already amicably settled their dispute by way of entering into a compromise and on the basis of the said compromise, the other proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act have been withdrawn. Counsel further submits that in terms of the said compromise, now the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioner in the present FIR No.86/2021, registered with Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 IPC. Counsel submits that under these circumstances, the order dated 02.05.2026 be recalled and the impugned FIR be quashed in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. The complainant-respondent ‘PS’ has put appearance in person. She has been duly identified by her counsel. She admits the factum of compromise between the parties and she submits that she has no objection in case, proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR are quashed in favour of the petitioner. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner as well as the counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and looking to the fact that the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise and now, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioner and also [2026:RJ-JP:22636] (3 of 3) [CRLMA-242/2026] considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR. 7. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. application stands allowed. The order dated 02.05.2026 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. petition No.3784/2021 stands recalled. 8. The proceedings arising out the impugned FIR No.86/2021 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 IPC stand quashed and set-aside. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/92