PRADIP BORGOHAIN and ANR. v. PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/235/2017 · 2026-06-09
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7851 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7851 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010022712017
2026:GAU-AS:8260
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/235/2017 PRADIP BORGOHAIN and ANR.
ASSISTANT TEACHER, GARIAJAN KALITACHUK LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, DHEMAJI, DIST- DHEMAJI, PIN- 787057, ASSAM 2: DINESH BURAGOHAIN ASSISTANT TEACHER NO.2 DEOGHARIA LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL DHEMAJI DIST- DHEMAJI PIN- 787057 ASSA VERSUS PREETOM SAIKIA and 3 ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELEMENTARY DEPARTMENT, SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, ASSAM 2:SANJIB KR. BHUYAN THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781019 ASSAM 3:NIRADA DOLEY PEGU THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER DHEMAJI DIST- DHEMAJI PIN- 787057 ASSAM 4:ANADAR DOLEY
Page No.# 2/3 THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS DHEMAJI DIST- DHEMAJI PIN- 787057 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A GOHAIN, MR.U J SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A DEKAR-2, MS.K GOGOI(R-2),MR.D SAIKIA(R-2)(R- 1),MR.B TALUKDAR(R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 10.06.2026
1. Heard Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This contempt petition is filed alleging willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 28.07.2016, passed in WP(C) No.4754/2011, which was preferred by the petitioners claiming arrears of salary, wherein, it was directed to the authorities to pay the salaries to the petitioners from the month of August, 2007.
3. It is submitted that in the meantime the case of the petitioners were considered and they were accommodated as tutors in the year 2020.
4. Mr. A Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though they have been accommodated as tutors, however, they are not satisfied with such a decision and prays that the instant contempt petition may be closed with a liberty to them to assail such appointments as tutors as they still claim that they are
Page No.# 3/3 entitled to be appointed as Assistant Teachers.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition stands closed with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant