APHC010550042007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3602] THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL NOs: 170 of 2007 & 6 of 2008 AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1631 of 2009 F.C.A.No.170 of 2007: Between: 1. KUNAPULI SRIVALLI, W/O. K. SIVA KUMAR, D/O. PAKALA ATHMA RAMA RAO, TEACHER R/O. C/O. P.A. RAMA RAO, SOEIETYPET, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, ...APPELLANT AND 1. KUNAPULI SIVA KUMAR, S/o. K. narayana Rao, Employee in Electricity Department, R/o. 21-2-9, Jana Chettu Street, Mutyalampadu, Vijayawada, ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY F.C.A.No.6 of 2008: Between: 2 1. KUNAPULLI SRIVALLI, W/O.K. SIVA KUMAR D/O. PAKALA ATHMA RAMA RAO TEACHER R/O.C/O.P.A.RAMA RAO SOCIETYPET, GANNAVARAM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL ...APPELLANT AND 1. KUNAPULI SIVA KUMAR, S/o. K. Narayana Rao Employee in Electricity Department R/o. 21-2-9, Jana Chettu Street, Mutyalampadu, Vijayawada, ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY C.R.P.No.1631 of 2009: Between: 1. KUNAPULI SRIVALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, W/O K. SIVA KUMAR R/O D.NO. 10-115, SOCIETY PETA BRAHMANA PARISHAD, GANNAVARAM KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. KUNAPULI SIVAKUMAR KRISHNA DISTRICT, S/o late Narayana Rao R/o D.No. 23-2-11, Bhagat Singh Road Lakshmi Nagar Vijayawada-11, Krishna District ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM FAMILY COURT APPEAL NOs:170 of 2007 & 6 of 2008 AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1631 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 14.07.2026, as there is no representation for the appellant/petitioner, these matters are posted to 28.07.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 30.07.2026, again, these matters are listed under the same caption, but there is no representation for the appellant/petitioner. To give one more opportunity, again posted to 06.08.2026. On 06.08.2026 also, there is no representation for the appellant/petitioner. As a last chance, posted to today. Today also there is no representation. 2. It appears that the appellant/petitioner has no interest to prosecute these cases. Accordingly, these Family Court Appeals and Civil Revision Petition are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ______________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM 13.08.2026 Vns