Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 78454 (MAD)

Venda v. Saroja

CRP/328/2026 · 2026-01-29

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No. 328 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 328 of 2026 1. Venda, W/o Late Balan, Res at No 30, Govindaraj Gounder Street, Kattupadi Koot Road, Thuthipet Post, Near Adukkambari, Vellore Taluk, Vellore District. 2. B. Nesamani. S/o Late Balan, Res at No 30, Govindaraj Gounder Street, Kattupadi Koot Road, Thuthipet Post, Near Adukkambari, Vellore Taluk, Vellore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Saroja, W/o Late Balan, Res at Peranambakkam Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. B. Karunathi, S/o Late Balan, Res at Peranambakkam Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. B. Parivallal, S/o Late Balan, Res at Peranambakkam Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 328 of 2026 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India seeking direction to the Learned Additional District Munsif Court at Vellore District to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.164 of 2022 within stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Raja Ravi Varma ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.164 of 2022, within a stipulated time, fixed by this court. 2. The petitioners are the defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.164 of 2022 and the first respondent herein/plaintiff filed the above said suit against the petitioners and two other defendants seeking partition of 1/4 share. She also sought for declaration that the settlement deed dated 19.04.2006 executed in favour of the 2nd defendant was null and void. It is seen from the adjudication status filed in the typed set of papers that initially the suit was dismissed for default as against the defendants 3 and 4 and the same was restored on the application filed by the first respondent/plaintiff. As on today, suit summons were not served on the defendants 3 and 4. Since service is not yet completed, I am not inclined to give any positive direction to the trial court to dispose of the suit. However, the Trial court shall make endeavour to dispose of the suit in __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 328 of 2026 O.S.No.164 of 2022 expeditiously, after service of suit summons on the defendants 3 and 4. 3. With the above direction, this civil revision petition is disposed of . There shall be no order as to costs. 29-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MST To The Additional District Munsif, Vellore. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 328 of 2026 S.SOUNTHAR, J. MST CRP No. 328 of 2026 29-01-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis