Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7843 (GAU)

M/S JAIN ASSOCIATES v. ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL) AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/2893/2026 · 2026-06-09

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010108832026 2026:GAU-AS:8271 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2893/2026 M/S JAIN ASSOCIATES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, 1932, BEARING REGISTRATION NO. 06-003-2019-00085, HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT ALAHAR ROAD, VILLAGE BAHADURPUR, P.O. NAGAL KHAJURI, DIST.- YAMUNANAGAR, HARYANA- 135001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SHRI MANISH JAIN, S/O SHRI ANIL KUMAR JAIN RESIDENT OF RABINDRA NAGAR, BIRPERA TEA GARDEN, BIRPARA, DISTRICT JALPAIGURI, WEST BENGAL, PIN- 735204. VERSUS ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL) AND 2 ORS A GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM UNDERTAKING, CIN U40109AS2003SGC007242, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI - 781001, ASSAM. 2:THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECT PLANNING AND DESIGN) MATERIALS/TESTING COMMISSIONING CIRCLE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED 6TH FLOOR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 ASSAM. 3:THE VENDOR EVALUATION COMMITTEE ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 6TH FLOOR BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI -781001 ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.M. Mahanta, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K.P. Pathak, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. K.M. Mahanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. K.P. Pathak, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the APDCL. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the e- mail dated 15.05.2026 whereby the petitioner was informed that pursuant to the recommendation of the Vendor Evaluation Committee in its meeting held on 29.03.2026, the vendor approval granted to the petitioner's firm had been cancelled until further notice, in view of the discontinuation of vendor registration for next five years letter received from the state utility (SBPDCL). 3. Mr. K.P. Pathak, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the APDCL submitted that subsequent to the filing of the Page No.# 3/3 present writ petition the Respondent Authorities in a meeting held on 06.06.2026 have withdrawn the cancellation of the petitioner's vendor approval communicated vide the e-mail dated 15.05.2026. In that regard, the learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court a communication dated 09.06.2026 issued by the Chief General Manager (PP&D), APDCL which is kept on record and marked with the letter “X”. 4. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains in the instant writ petition, for which, the same stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant