Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7843 (BOM)

SAYYED SAFURA YAZDANI JAGIRDAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/11692/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 61-WP-11692-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11692 OF 2026 SAYYED SAFURA YAZDANI JAGIRDAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Mr. Hamzakhan I. Pathan, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 08th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Several decisions are rendered by this Court holding that passing of TET examination is not mandatory condition in case of Minority Institutions. 2. Hence, the impugned order dated 03/08/2019 passed by respondent No.2, is quashed and set aside. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to decide the proposal of the petitioner dated 26/05/2025 in the light of the order dated 23/01/2023, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.633/2023 and connected writ petitions and the order dated 13/03/2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2821/2023, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2026:BHC-AUG:41509-DB 2 61-WP-11692-26.odt SVH