HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36207 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Ms. Neetu Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Satanand Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Case No. 58225 of 2018, CNR No. UPKN040583382018 (State Vs. Kalpit Preajapati and others), under Sections 498A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Nagar, arising out of Case Crime No. 0681 of 2017 as well as cognizance order dated 23.10.2018, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC, Kanpur Nagar, on the basis of compromise dated 28.04.2026. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing this application under Section 528 BNSS with prayer to quash the proceedings in terms of compromise entered between the parties and this Court vide order dated 07.05.2026 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 29.05.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled their dispute through compromise and, as such, opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neetu Mishra, Sanskar Gaur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Satanand Mishra Kalpit Prajapati @ Kalpit Kumar Prajapati And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, entire proceedings of aforesaid case, are hereby quashed in terms of compromise dated 28.04.2026. 8. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. September 15, 2026 v.k. updh. NA528 No. 36207 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad