2026:JHHC:5624 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 630 of 2026 Amol @ Anmol Kumar Yadav @ Amol Kumar Yadav, aged about 22 years, S/o-Bhagwan Kumar Yadav @ Bhagwan Yadav, R/o -Chhoti Kodar Janna, PO-Ganga Prasad, PS-Sahibganj (M), District-Sahibganj ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, APP -------- Order No. 02/Dated: 25th February 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 96, 127(2), 115(2), 352, 3(5) of B.N.S, 2023 (corresponding Sections 366(A), 342, 323, 504, 34 IPC) in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 93 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 739 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has committed no offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the statement of the victim girl falsifies the entire allegation made against the petitioner. He submits that the victim girl has made allegation against the informant that she has been assaulted by the informant therefore she left her house. He further submits there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner and he is in custody since 16.09.2025. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the victim girl is minor. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the 2026:JHHC:5624 2 petitioner, above-named on bail. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed, at this stage. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th February 2026 Amit Uploaded on 28/02/2026