Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7839 (RAJ)

SACHIN MEENA S/O RATIRAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4364/2026 · 2026-05-25

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22114] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4364/2026 Sachin Meena S/o Ratiram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Snet Ka Pura, P.s. Shrimahavirji, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Prasad Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Raghunath Prasad Bakolia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 25/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.137/2025 registered at Police Station-Mahaveerji, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(2) of BNS and Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act, 2019, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor & counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations levelled against the present petitioner is for inflicting the injuries to complainant- Jalla. He further submits that in the present matter, cross case has also been lodged by the petitioner side against complainant. He contended that custodial interrogation is not required and the complainant has arrived at a compromise with [2026:RJ-JP:22114] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4364/2026] the present petitioner. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant admitted the factum of compromise between the parties and has made no objection if the petitioner is granted bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Sachin Meena S/o Ratiram Meena, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/85