[2026:RJ-JP:21870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6639/2026 1. Abid Son Of Israel, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) 2. Asif Son Of Israel, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Gulpada, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 22/05/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.48/2026 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 303(2) and 333 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though there is an allegation regarding causing grievous injury by a sharp-edged weapon, as per the medical opinion, the grievous injury alleged by the prosecution pertains to injured Akib is on [2026:RJ-JP:21870] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6639/2026] right hand. It is further submitted that both the parties are residents of the same locality and that a cross-case exists between them, which clearly indicates that the petitioners side had also sustained injuries. Co-accused Israel has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 24.04.2026. The petitioners are behind bars since 29.03.2026 and have no criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Abid Son Of Israel and Asif Son Of Israel, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 53/Arun