Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7831 (KAR)

SRI RAJESH N B v. SMT SHRUTHI

RPFC/189/2021 · 2026-02-10

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7997 RPFC No. 189 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 189 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAJESH N B S/O LATE BABUA RAO AGED 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.240, 1ST MAIN ROAD, RAGHAVENDRANAGAR BUS STOP MYSURU-570029. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. Y.K. NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT SHRUTHI AGED 32 YEARS, W/O SRI RAJESH D/O SRI NARAYANA RAO, 2. KUM.MANISH AGED 14 YEARS, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7997 RPFC No. 189 of 2021 3. MASTER HARSHA AGED 13 YEARS, R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS REPTD BY THEIR MOTHER SHRUTHI PETITIONER NO.1 ALL ARE R/AT NO.1074, LIG-2M 3RD CROSS, KALYANAGARI KYATHAMARANAHALLI LAYOUT, AKSHYA BANDERE, MYSURU-570026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. POOJAPPA J., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3 R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS REP. BY R1) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.08.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.424/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7997 RPFC No. 189 of 2021 ORAL ORDER This revision petition is filed assailing the order that is rendered by the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru in Criminal Misc. Case No.424/2020 dated 13.08.2021. 2. Sri.Y.V. Prakash representing Sri Y.K. Narayan Sharma learned counsel on record for the petitioner is present. Petitioner Sri. Rajesh N.B is also present in person. Sri. Poojappa J learned counsel for respondents is present. Equally respondent No.1 Smt. Shruthi is present. 3. Both the learned counsel submit that parties to the proceedings arrived at a settlement before the mediation centre and therefore recording the terms of settlement, the revision petition may be disposed of. 4. Having gone through the contents of the memorandum of settlement and upon hearing both the learned counsel and the parties, the revision petition is disposed of with the following:- - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7997 RPFC No. 189 of 2021 ORDER i. Petitioner and respondent No.1 agreed to lead their matrimonial life happily along with their children and the same is recorded. ii. Both parties agreed to withdraw the cases if any filed by them against each other and the same is recorded. iii. Petitioner/husband agreed to give a sum of Rs.13,000/- per month to respondent No.1/wife to run the family which includes the expenses to be incurred for the children as well. iv. Petitioner/husband undertakes to give more money during the times of need to the family however subject to his earnings. v. Petitioner/husband undertakes to bear entire education and marriage expenses of the children. vi. The terms of settlement are recorded. vii. The memorandum of settlement signed by both parties and their respective counsel shall form part of record. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7997 RPFC No. 189 of 2021 viii. The revision petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39