Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7831 (GAU)

ZAMAL UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/959/2026 · 2026-06-09

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010091112026 2026:GAU-AS:8203 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/959/2026 ZAMAL UDDIN S/O - DILWAR HUSSAIN R/O VILLAGE - KARAIONI, P.O. - KARAIONI, P.S. - MURAJHAR, DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM, PIN 782439 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:ANJUMA BEGUM D/O - MORTUJ ALI LASKAR R/O VILLAGE - KARAIONI P.O. - KARAIONI P.S. - MURAJHAR DISTRICTHOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782439 CONTACT NO. 700215192 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P BORAH, MR B PAUL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, M DAS(R2),MR K K MEDHI(R2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 10-06-2026 Heard Mr. D P Borah, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B Sharma, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of State respondent and Mr. Page No.# 2/2 K K Medhi, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2. The Case Diary is already received and Mr. Medhi, the learned counsel for respondent no. 2 also filed his written objection. At the time of hearing the case it is also submitted by Mr. Sharma, the learned Addl. PP that the case is also charge-sheeted vide C.S. No. 67/2026 dated 13.05.2026. In view of above, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may approach the appropriate Court i.e the Trial Court with an appropriate application for regular bail, which may be considered in accordance with law. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant