APHC010192492024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9549/2024 Between: 1. VANARCHE RAMA RAJU, S/O LATE V.GOPAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.7-63, DOOPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. VANARCHE MEENAKSHI, W/O. VANARCHE RAMU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.77-124-10-29B,KALLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SHANTI SIVARAM REKANDAR,, D/O.V.KESAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.109/7-66/C,B.C.COLONY, DUPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. VANARCHE CHINNA SANKARAIH, S/O. VANARCHE SANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.7/63, DOOPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. VANARCHE NAGAMMA, W/O VANARCHE RAMA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- COOLI, R/O H.NO.7-63, DOOPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. VANARCHE KESAVA RAO, S/O LATE V.GOPAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.7-65, DOOPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. BYTINTI VEERA BADRAIAH, S/O B.PEDDA HANUMANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- COOLI, R/O H.NO.80/11/120C,ABBAS 2 NAGAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. VANARCHE RAMA KRISHNA, S/O LATE V.GOPAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC-COOLI, R/O H.NO.7-199, DOOPADU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRIC 9. TELUGU MADDILETY, S/O. TELUGU YELLAPPA, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC.COOLI, R/O.27-1/13/15, KRISHNA COMPLEX, NAFILLUDU, TIRUMALAGIRI, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, HYDERABAD, T.S. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT ENDOWMENTS OFFICER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI JAGANNADHA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. THE GENERAL MANAGER, ISKON TEMPLE, PARK ROAD, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT 7. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF ASSURANCE, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action 3 of the respondents 2 to 6 in trying to evict/dispossess and demolish the petitioners houses plot bearing Nos.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,25,26,28,29,31, 32,33,37 and 40, respectively in Sy.No.60,60/1 to 3 situated at Lakshmipuram Gram Panchayati, Doopadu Village Fields, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District, now within the Kurnool Municipal Corporation Limits, under the guise of Lr.Dis. No.MI/CEO-19025(42)/33/2023, dated. 07-02-2024 issued by the 2nd respondent in favour of the 6th respondent for11 years lease, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjustified, without jurisdiction, unsustainable and violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and contrary to the rules in vogue andconsequently set aside the same and direct the respondents herein not to evict or dispossess and demolish the petitioners subject house plots without following the procedure contemplated under law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in trying to evict/dispossess and demolish the petitioners houses plot bearing Nos.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,25,26,28,29,31, 32,33,37 and 40, respectively in Sy.No.60,60/1 to 3 situated at Lakshmipuram Gram Panchayati, Doopadu Village Fields, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District, now within the Kurnool Municipal Corporation Limits, under the guise of Lr.Dis. No.MI/CEO-19025(42)/33/2023, dated. No.MI/CEO-19025(42)/33/2023, dated. 07-02-2024 issued by the 2nd respondent in favour of the 6th respondent for11 years lease, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjustified, without jurisdiction, unsustainable and violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and contrary to the rules in vogue andconsequently set aside the same and direct the respondents herein not to evict or dispossess and demolish the petitioners subject house plots without following the procedure contemplated under law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 4 1. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.9549 OF 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners addressed a letter dated 04.08.2026 to the Registry, enclosing copy of the letters addressed by the petitioners to the learned counsel, requesting to list this matter under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. 2. Accordingly, the matter is listed today i.e., on 11.08.2026 under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. 3. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 11.08.2026 KBN 6 54 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.9549 of 2024 Date: 11.08.2026 KBN