2026:JHHC:6253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11101 of 2025 Ali Haidar, aged about 30 years, S/o Kasim Ansari, resident of village- Suggipahari, P.O & P.S- Palajori, District- Deoghar (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, APP --- 04/10.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.09.2025 in connection with M.C.A. No. 1580/2025 arising out of Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, registered under sections 111(2)(b), 111(3),111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) & 84C of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum- Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He has then submitted that two co- accused namely, Bishnu Kumar Das and Hasmuddin Ansari have been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court in B.A. No. 11338 of 2025 and B.A. No. 10862 of 2025 respectively. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per paragraph 77 of the case-diary, there is one victim who has supported the case of the prosecution as against the petitioner whereby he has been looted for Rs. 18,000/- and he has also reported the alleged fraud through online complaint mode. 5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even Hasmuddin Ansari is said to have cheated one victim to the extent of Rs. 4,598/- and he has been enlarged on bail. 2026:JHHC:6253 2 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner was apprehended on the spot with mobile and it has been alleged that he has committed cyber offence and one victim has also lodged a complaint in connection with commission of cyber fraud to the extent of Rs.18,000/- using the mobile of the petitioner which has been seized from the possession of the petitioner , this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and hence, this bail application is rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:10.03.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:11.03.2026