2026:HHC:3390 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1455 of 2026 Decided on : 28.01.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Reeta Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of HP and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Vacation Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General, for respondents-State. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. In view of the prayer made in the writ petition, no reply is intended to be filed by the respondents. 3. In the present petition, the petitioner has made an innocuous prayer for adjudication of earlier representation, which she has made vide Annexure P-1 on 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:3390 07.11.2025. 4. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already made a representation, let the competent authority take a final call in the said representation as expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. However, before deciding the representation, the petitioner may be heard and further the additional facts, if submitted, by her may also be considered by the competent authority. 5. The petition is accordingly disposed of. CMP No. 1932 of 2026 6. Keeping in view the order passed in the main petition, the present application is rendered infructuous and disposed of. 28 th January , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Vacation Judge