Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 783 (BOM)

PRANAY S/O VIVEKANAND NIKHADE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PACHPAOLI POLICE STATION NAGPUR AND ANR

BA/57/2026 · 2026-02-17

Shri M M Nerlikar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 25-Cr.BA-57-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [B.A.] NO. 57 OF 2026 Pranay s/o Vivekanand Nikhade -- VERSUS -- The State of Maharashtra and Another __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Mr. S.P. Sonwane, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A.A. Madiwale, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant No.1/State. Ms. Varsha A. Warade, Advocate (appointed) for the Non- applicant No.2. CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2026. When this Court has shown its disinclination to grant bail, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present application, with liberty to file a fresh application, in case, the trial is not commenced within four months. 2. Permission granted. The Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. 3. The fees of the appointed counsel be quantified and paid as per rules. [ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ] Piyush Mahajan 2026:BHC-NAG:2764