Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010040982017 2026:GAU-AS:8297 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/474/2017 PHUKAN CHANDRA NATH S/O LT. JUPAK CHANDRA NATH R/O VILL- HABIBARANG BARI, P.O. HABIBARANG BARI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS SANJIV SINGH and 4 ORS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. CORPORATE OFFICE, SADIQU NAGAR- 3079/3 SADIQ NAGAR J.B. TITIO MARG, NEW DELHI - 110049. 2:MR. B.S. CANTH DIRECTOR MARKETING INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED MARKETING DIVISION MARKETING DIVISION HEAD OFFICE INDIAN OIL BHAWAN G-9 ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDR EAST MUMBAI- 400051. 3:MR. GURMEET SINGH ED LPG INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION MARKETING DIVISION HEAD OFFICE INDIAN OIL BHAWAN G-9 ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA EAST MUMBAI- 400051. 4:MR. RAMESH KUMAR Page No.# 2/3 GENERAL MANAGER I/C HR INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE INDIAN OIL BHAWAN-2 GARIAHAT ROAD DHAKURI KOLKATA- 700068. 5:MR. DIPANKAR RAY ED INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. MARKETING DIVISION INDIAN OIL AOD STATE OFFICE INDIAN OIL BHAWNA SECTOR-III NOONMATI GUWAHATI - 781020 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M BORKAKATI, MR. A CHETRY,MR. M P SARMA,MR. U K NAIR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M K CHOUDHURYSr.Adv.R- 4and5R-1,2and3, MR. M SHARMA(R- 1,2&3),MR. N BARUAH(R-4)(R- 1,2&3),MR P BHARDWAJ (R- 4&5)(R- 1,2&3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 11-06-2026 1. The present contempt petition is filed alleging wilful deliberate violation of the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in WP(C) No. 2421/2009. 2. By the aforesaid order, the penalty imposed upon the petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority and affirmed by the Appellate Authority were interfered with, and the respondents were directed to give consequential benefits to the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 3. The respondents have brought on record by filing affidavit that the order has been complied with by promoting the petitioner to the next higher grade and same was also intimated to the petitioner. 4. I have perused the affidavit. 5. In my opinion, the order dated 29.09.2015 passed in WP(C) No. 2421/2009 has duly been complied with. However, if any grievance still remains, the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum by filing appropriate application. 6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant