HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8071/2026 Ranglal S/o Kanwar Lal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Kholi Police Station Ghatoli District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Gangapur City District Sawai Madhopur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Radha Raman Gupta, CI, Sadar Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 27/05/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Ranglal S/o Kanwar Lal under Section 483 of BNSS, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.132/2022 dated 22.03.2022 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 18, 21, 25 of NDPS Act, 1985 and 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case of the year 2022 and has nothing to do with the alleged offences as mentioned in the FIR. He submits that police recovered the alleged contraband substance from the possession of the co-accused persons and the recovered substance is not related to him. Further, the samples of (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8071/2026] the alleged contraband substance has failed to be a Narcotic and Psychotropic substance as per the FSL report. In view of the above, since, there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that benefit of bail may be granted to him in the present case. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and Investigating Officer are present before this Court and strongly oppose the bail application. 4. This Court considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and noticed that the alleged contraband substance was recovered from the possession of the co-accused persons and they have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Further this Court noted that there is no recovery from the petitioner herein and the alleged contraband substance could not pass the FSL test. The complete investigation, as has been done in a manner in which the petitioner was arrested, appears to be highly illegal and unlawful. 5. This Court warns the Investigating Officer to be careful in future before taking any action under the provisions of NDPS Act, 1985 and to act with great care and caution while following the procedure laid down under the Act of 1985 and other applicable law. Without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is hereby allowed and it is directed that accused- petitioner Ranglal S/o Kanwar Lal shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8071/2026] satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. 7. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 8. The petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned SHO of the Police Station twice a month for the entire period of the trial. The SHO shall maintain register to mark presence of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to appear twice in any month then the same shall be considered as breach and the bail shall stands cancelled automatically without further reference to the Court. 9. It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case of NDPS Act during pendency of the trial, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J RINCHU/53