HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5109 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Chandra Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shiv Dutt Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Name of Sri Dhirendra Kumar Verma and Miss Renu Swarnkar, learned counsel appear as counsel for the first informant but they are not present. On the last occasion when the case was taken up, they were not present and the matter was directed to be listed peremptorily. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 376 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1), 61(2) BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Khajani, District Gorakhpur, during the pendency of the trial. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has stated that she had left her home on her free will and she had entered into matrimonial alliance with the applicant with her free consent. It is further submitted that there are two records regarding date of birth of the victim and as per record of one school her date of birth is 3.8.2008 whereas as per leaving school certificate of second school her date of birth is 1.2.2010. It is further submitted that the victim has refused to undergo medico-legal examination. It is also submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 7.11.2025 and he is having one criminal history Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Verma, G.A., Renu Swarnkar Vikas .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) which has been duly explained. It is lastly submitted that in case the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. As per the allegation in the FIR, the applicant is said to have enticed away the daughter of the first informant, however, the victim has been recovered and the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has stated that she had left her home on her free will and she had entered into matrimonial alliance with the applicant with her free consent. There are two records regarding date of birth of the victim and as per record of one school her date of birth is 3.8.2008 whereas as per leaving school certificate of second school her date of birth is 1.2.2010, however, there is no High School certificate or the certificate of school first attended and no radio-logical examination of the victim has been conducted for her age determination. The victim has refused to undergo medico-legal examination. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 7.11.2025 and he is having one criminal history which has been duly explained. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 8. Accordingly, the present application is ALLOWED. 9. Let the applicant- Vikas involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each BAIL No. 5109 of 2026 2 in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685. September 18, 2026 Abhishek BAIL No. 5109 of 2026 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad