[2026:RJ-JP:20606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8669/2026 Manju Choudhary D/o Shri Sukharam Choudhary, aged about 42 years, R/o Housing Board Colony, Devpura, Pradhanji Ki Janw, Sikar, Distt Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary to Govt., Local Self Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Local Self Department, Rajasthan Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Senior Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sikar, Distt. Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/05/2026 1. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to file appropriate representation before the concerned authority in the light of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India though its Secretary and Ors., reported in (2015) 7 SCC 291 wherein it has been held that currency of a suspension should not extend beyond three months, if within this period the Memorandum of Charges/Charge-sheet is not served on the delinquent officer/employee and if Memorandum of Charges/Charge-sheet is served, a reasoned order must be passed for extension of the suspension. 2. Permission sought for is granted. [2026:RJ-JP:20606] (2 of 2) [CW-8669/2026] 3. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the concerned authority within a period of two weeks from today. 4. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority by way of passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of its receipt along with certified copy of this order. It is also directed that concerned authority shall intimate the petitioner about the fate of the representation filed by him through speed-post or email, if an e-mail address is provided by the petitioner in his representation. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and concerned authority shall consider and decide the representation independently and strictly in accordance with law. 7. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /27