Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7821 (GAU)

MAFIJUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/2825/2025 · 2026-06-09

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010265002025 2026:GAU-AS:8176 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2825/2025 MAFIJUR RAHMAN SON OF MD. KHALILUR RAHMAN R/O VILL- BAPUJI NAGAR, NIZARAPAR P.O. NOONMATI P.S. NOONMATI DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781020 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:THE OFFICER-IN- CHARGE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M HOQUE, MS J BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS B R A SULTANA (LEGAL AID COUNSEL FOR THE INFORMANT) Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Hoque, learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State respondent as well as Ms. B.R.A. Sultana, learned counsel appearing for the informant, respondent no. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant in connection with All Women P.S. Case No. 86/2025, registered under Sections 85/82(2)/318(2) of the BNS, 2023. A coordinate bench of this Court, vide order dated 19.12.2025 had granted interim bail to the accused-applicant with the condition that the accused-applicant shall cooperate with the investigation. The learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that in terms of the aforesaid order dated 19.12.2025, the accused-applicant had already appeared before the Investigating Officer and got his statement recorded and is cooperating with the investigation. Mr. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P., confirms that the accused-applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer. Taking into account the aforesaid submissions, this Court is of the considered opinion that the interim order passed on 19.12.2025 should be made absolute in the same terms and conditions as stated therein. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of by confirming the interim order passed by this Court on 19.12.2025. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant