Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 782 (AP)

BATTU RAMARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9545/2026 · 2026-04-09

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010175892026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9545/2026 Between: 1. BATTU RAMARAO, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC SARPANCH KOTHAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, R/O. D. NO. 2- 41, KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, DARSI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, TADEPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the inaction of the respondents in considering the request made for appointing the petitioner as person in charge of Kothapalli Gram Panchayat, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District, by following section 143 (3) of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, by considering the representation dt.30-03-2026, is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to the Panchayat Raj Act, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the request made by the petitioner for appointing as person in charge of Kothapalli Gram Panchayat, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District, by following section 143 (3) of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, by considering the representation dt. 30-03-2026, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Sri Ashok, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 10.04.2026 SNI 41 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.9545 OF 2026 Dated: 10.04.2026 SNI