APHC010599142011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25502 OF 2011 Between: 1. R.T.Narasingh Bhan Singh, s/o.R.Ganesh Singh Attender R/o.Borrurbatti, Opp:Jandi Tractor Show room, Balleri Road, Aluru, Kurnool District-518315 ...Petitioner AND 1. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad, rep.by its Registrar (Administration) 2. The District Judge Kurnool Kurnool District, rep.by its Registrar (Administration) ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner case for appointment to the posts of Process Server in pursuance of the orders of the Hon`ble High Court in WP.No.18906 of 1998 dated 18.8.1998 is illegal, arbitrary,and unjust and consequently direct the respodnent to consider the petitioner case for appointment to the post of 2 process Server in pursuance of the orders of the Hon`ble High Court in WP.No.18906 of 1998 dated 18.8.1998 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 31403 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Process Server in pursuance of the orders of the Hon`ble High Court in WP.No.18906 of 1998 dated 18.8.98 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: A JAYANTHI The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: 25502 OF 2011 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, we are constrained to dismiss the writ petition for non prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J _______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J GVK 4 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No. 25502 OF 2011 Dt. 18.08.2026 GVK