[2026:RJ-JP:21816] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9267/2026 Jagdish Prasad Saini S/o Shri Okarmal, Aged About 66 Years, Ward No. 15, Reengus Road, Danta, Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Municipality, Dataramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) Through Chairman. 2. Tehsildar, Dantaramgarh, Disrict Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 22/05/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and respondents be directed to pass appropriate order in favour of the petitioner and call for the entire record relating to the case and after examining the same: i) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith implement the decision/resolution taken in the meeting of the Municapality whereby it was resolved to allot a commercial shop measuring 10*25 feet situated at Jhaladi Talai to the family members of the deceased petitioner's wife as a measure of rehabilitation and compensatory relief; ii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the re- spondent authorities to immediately construct and develop the drainage structure measuring 4 feet * 4 feet and to undertake all necessary public safety measures in the concerned locality so as to prevent recuurence of such unfortunate incidents in fu- ture; iii. issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the re- spondents to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner in a fair, just and time-bound manner by passing a reasoned and speaking order; iv. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner may kindly be passed with cost." 2. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his [2026:RJ-JP:21816] (2 of 2) [CW-9267/2026] clients, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; a direction may kindly be issued to respondent No.1- Municipality, Dataramgarh, District Sikar, to decide the pending representation dated 25.12.2024 (Annexure-2) in a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1- Municipality, Dataramgarh, District Sikar, to decide the pending representation dated 25.12.2024 (Annexure-2) within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receiving the certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the said representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. All other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-32