IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.140 of 2026 Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 __________________________________________________________________________ State of Himachal Pradesh ……...Petitioner Versus Pradeep Kumar and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? _____________________________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.1, 2 and 5. Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.3, 4 and 6. Mr. Divya Raj Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.7 & 8. __________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the respondents, while placing on record daily status of cases pending/decided in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, states that respondents stand acquitted and as such, present petition has rendered infructuous. 2. After having perused aforesaid document, placed on record by the respondents, learned Additional Advocate General states that on 2 account of acquittal of the respondents, present petition has rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 30, 2026 (Rajeev Raturi)