SHRUTHI v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/32300/2025 · 2026-02-05
A D Jagadish Chandira
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 78085 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 78085 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.02.2026 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 & Crl.M.P.Nos.22407 & 22408 of 2025 Shruthi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Inspector of Police, W-27, All Women Police Station, Vadapalani, Chennai. 2.Dr.Prabu Thilaak .. Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to call for the entire records relating to Spl.S.C.No.69 of 2024 on the file of the Court of Special Judge for exclusive trial of offences under POCSO Act cases, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Siva Kumar
For Respondents: Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.Emalias for R2
1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.69 of 2024 on the file of the Court of Special Judge for exclusive trial of offences under POCSO Act cases, Chennai. 2.The case of the petitioner is that her marriage with the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant was solemnized on 24.10.2007 and they were blessed with two children. Due to matrimonial disputes, the petitioner left the matrimonial home on 25.09.2022 along with her two children and initiated domestic violence proceedings in D.V.C.No.95 of 2022 before the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. Subsequently, the 2nd respondent lodged a complaint against the petitioner, which was registered in Crime No.310 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 355, 323, and 506(ii) of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, currently pending as C.C.No.16202 of 2022. 3.As a counterblast, the petitioner lodged a complaint against the 2nd respondent and one Dr. Indira Priyadharshini, which is pending in S.T.C.No.5425 of 2024 and the said proceeding has been stayed in 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 Crl.R.C.No.1303 of 2024. Furthermore, the petitioner, who is the mother of the victim girl, was arrested in connection with Crime No.310 of 2022 on
29.10.2022. Aggrieved by the DVC proceedings and the Habeas Corpus Petition for custody, the 2nd respondent filed the present complaint under the POCSO Act, which is pending as Spl.S.C.No.69 of 2024. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the instant Criminal Original Petition to quash the said proceedings.
4.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that the trial has already commenced and that the chief examination of P.W.1 is over, and part of the cross-examination by the accused is also completed and the case is currently posted to 07.02.2026 for the continuation of cross-examination. 5.In view of the fact that the trial has already commenced, this Court finds no reason to interdict the proceedings. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.02.2026 raa 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. raa To 1.The Special Judge for exclusive trial of offences under POCSO Act Cases, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, W-27, All Women Police Station, Vadapalani, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai Crl.O.P.No.32300 of 2025 05.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis